by George Masnick Fellow |
But this report fails to underscore that the vast majority of baby boom household dissolution won’t occur until after 2030. Only about 15 percent of the 46+ million units baby boomers now occupy will be turned back to the market between now and 2030, assuming cohort household dissolution rates held constant at 2000-2010 levels. This works out to about 1 million total baby boomer housing units returned to the market between 2010 and 2020, and another 6.2 million between 2020 and 2030. For owner-occupied housing, these numbers are 165,000 during 2010-2020 and 5.2 million between 2020 and 2030. If baby boomers are healthier and live longer than their immediate predecessors, these numbers should be even lower.
Source: Joint Center calculations of household counts in
2000 and 2010 Decennial Censuses. Assumes cohort attrition rates held constant
at 2000-2010 levels.
By aging in place, boomers
will likely follow existing trends among older homeowners. Elderly owners are
the least mobile demographic group. Less than three percent of owners age 65-74
change residences in any given year, and this fraction has been declining,
while for owners age 75+, the share that moves in a given year is now about 1.5
percent. Such low mobility rates result
in elderly homeowners having increasing durations of residency in their present
homes: the older the owner, the higher the proportion with long-term residency.
Indeed, according to the American Housing Survey, the majority of homeowners
age 65+ have lived in their homes for 20 or more years (Figure B). These
patterns have changed little over the past decade.
Source: Joint Center tabulations of 1999, 2003, 2005 and 2009 American Housing Surveys. The 2004 data are averages of 2003 and 2005.
Aging in place does not
necessarily mean that housing adjustments fail to take place. Renovation and remodeling activity will allow
those aging in place to repair, modernize, and reconfigure their homes. Some of this remodeling activity will take
place before age 65 to prepare the home for aging in place. The 50s and early 60s are an ideal time to
undertake major remodeling projects – the kids have fledged the nest and the
still-employed parents have some additional disposable income. Past trends suggest that while there is some
fall-off in total remodeling spending after owners turn age 65, elderly owners
will remain fairly active in spending on renovation and repair (Figure C). More detail about aging in place and
remodeling activity is the subject of a forthcoming Joint Center working paper.
The "aging in place" story may be even more pronounced then these projections suggest.
ReplyDeleteIf the experience of my family is any guide, younger homebuyers in their 30's and 40's may be looking towards their 80's when they buy.
The next house that my wife and I purchase will have the following attributes:
- Somewhere walkable to services, for the day when we don't want to kill someone by driving.
- A bedroom on the first floor....and no stairs.
- Bathrooms and kitchens that are accessible.
We see housing as our place to live, not an investment, and we see how illiquid housing can be. Health emergencies tend to come much faster than the ability to sell.....
The motto for baby bust homebuyers may be "think old"......and once we get our old folks ready home (even if those years are not until 2040) we are staying put.
Being able to "think old" and buy a home you plan to still live in 30 years later means that you have (a) stable employment that won't require you to move and (b) geographically proximate family (or no desire to move closer to family).
DeleteHopefully neither of these issues will be a problem for you...and an advantage of having a fully accessible house is that you could easily accommodate aging parents! But I'd be interested to see more information on how these factors could impact the ability for the baby busters to have this kind of housing stability.